← MF leaderboard

Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option

Nippon India Mutual Fund · Equity · mandate: ≥35% in large-caps and ≥35% in mid-caps · benchmark: NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI (TRI proxy)
AUM (all plans)
7,147 cr
Active return /yr (full)
Score
56
Rank (Score, pool)
#10 of 35
Percentile (full, pool)
IR vs benchmark
0.52
CAGR (absolute)
17.0%
Max drawdown
-37.3%
Months of data
163
Percentile ranks this fund within its peer pool; the leaderboard Score is the weighted average of its fiscal-year percentiles (equity: active-return-rank blended with IR-rank).

Cumulative active return

20222023202420252026-149Cumulative active return vs benchmark, %
Growth of the fund relative to its benchmark: +10 means ₹100 in the fund is worth 10% more than ₹100 in the benchmark since the start of the line.

Equity curve

2013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025202680421762Fund (NAV=100)Benchmark: NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRICategory median (L&M)

Drawdown

20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026-37-190Drawdown %

Fiscal-year record

FYActive vs BMvs categoryIR%ileTEBenchmarkFund returnmonths
FY22-0.5%5022.9%12
FY230.5%-0.4%0.06573.5%0.3%0.8%12
FY242.5%3.2%0.76692.3%45.3%47.8%12
FY255.4%2.1%2.13852.3%7.1%12.5%12
FY26-1.1%-0.8%-0.40353.1%-1.1%-2.2%12
FY27*-0.1%-1.7%-0.18231.6%16.2%16.1%5
Active/Fund returns are TOTALS over the months covered — never annualized (FY27* is year-to-date; a * row covers only part of the year). %ile is the fund's percentile within its peer pool for that year.

Monthly active returns (%)

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
2022-0.1+0.9+0.3-1.5+0.9+0.2-1.5-0.6+0.6+0.4-1.2+0.3-1.4
2023+0.5+1.8+0.3-1.0+0.2-0.6+0.0-0.1-0.3+0.2+0.5+0.6+2.1
2024-0.1+0.9+1.5+0.3+1.0-0.6-0.2+0.6+0.4+0.6+1.6+0.5+6.7
2025-0.8+0.5+0.9-0.4-1.9+0.2+0.9+0.6+0.5-1.5-0.2-0.6-1.8
2026+0.2+1.1-0.0-0.8-0.0+0.2+0.1+0.4+1.1
Fund monthly return minus benchmark; the year column compounds each separately and differences them.

Monthly returns (%)

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
2013-9.7-2.7+9.5-1.7-3.1-7.7-5.4+5.4+10.9+1.2+5.6+0.0
2014-4.8+3.6+12.0+0.4+14.5+9.2-1.6+4.6+2.6+7.6+4.7-2.2+61.5
2015+6.3+1.7-2.6-3.4+1.1-1.6+4.2-5.5-2.2+2.0+0.3-1.4-1.6
2016-6.6-8.4+14.7+1.2+2.2+2.1+3.1+3.1-0.7+1.0-4.2-1.1+4.7
2017+4.5+4.9+2.6+1.7+5.4+0.0+6.0-0.8-0.6+7.6+1.6+3.4+42.4
2018-0.3-6.3-7.6+4.2-5.2-3.4+4.0+4.1-8.6-1.0+1.8+1.7-16.4
2019-4.7-2.2+9.4+1.8+1.9-0.0-9.1-2.6+6.7+4.3+1.1+0.7+6.2
2020+0.4-5.0-26.0+11.3-3.7+9.1+6.6+5.3-0.2+2.0+12.3+7.3+13.9
2021-0.9+8.8+0.9+0.0+5.8+3.3+4.2+5.6+3.3+0.1-3.7+3.1+34.4
2022-1.0-3.9+4.6-1.8-3.5-4.8+8.8+4.6-2.0+3.6+1.6-2.3+2.9
2023-2.5-0.4+0.3+3.6+4.6+4.4+4.3+0.9+2.3-3.0+8.3+8.2+34.9
2024+2.6+1.9+2.1+4.6+2.5+6.6+4.4+1.4+2.5-6.0+1.7-0.1+26.3
2025-4.7-7.9+8.2+3.2+2.3+3.9-1.9-1.5+1.8+3.0+1.3-0.9+6.2
2026-3.1+2.0-11.4+10.2+0.8+1.5+2.2+0.8+1.7

Quarterly average AUM & estimated net flows

201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520261,5594,3537,147AUM (quarter avg), ₹cr
-1,013876
Quarterly net flow estimate: AUM_q − AUM_(q−1)·(1+quarter return). AUM shown is the quarter AVERAGE (AMFI central disclosure). Positive = net inflows, ₹cr.
Source: AMFI's official all-scheme NAV history (portal report; official NAV history, net of TER by construction). Monthly returns are month-end NAV chains; stale prints (>7 days before month-end) drop out rather than carry. Benchmark series are the median of plain-vanilla direct-plan index funds tracking each index (TRI minus ~10-25bp/yr tracking drag — verified against true-TRI chains). Direct plans, growth option only. Sharpe uses rf 6%, arithmetic monthly convention. Independence: all figures are computed from mandatory public disclosures with a fixed methodology applied identically to every fund — no fund can pay for inclusion, exclusion, placement, or altered presentation, and any material commercial relationship will be disclosed on the affected pages. Nothing here is investment advice; past performance does not predict future returns. Generated 2026-08-25 05:37Z · data through Aug 2026 · leaderboard · PMS leaderboard
Feedback, inputs, or bug reports are appreciated — @vivekrmr on X · LinkedIn.