← PMS leaderboard

Citrus Sector Leaders

Citrus Advisors Private Limited · Equity · declared benchmark (as filed): Nifty 50 TRI · EdgePnL comparison benchmark (inferred from returns): BSE 500 TRI
AUM
47 cr
CAGR (full)
9.9%
Sharpe (full)
0.32
Declared BM CAGR (full)
8.6% (Nifty 50)
Inferred BM CAGR (full)
11.9% (BSE 500)
Active /yr vs declared BM
1.3%
Active /yr vs inferred BM
-1.9%
IR vs declared BM
0.24
IR vs inferred BM
-0.45
Percentile (full, strategy)
33
Percentile (full, benchmark group)
34
Rank (Score, strategy)
#1053 of 1,389
Rank (Score, benchmark group)
#954 of 1,257
Max drawdown
-17.1%
Since inception (APMI)
10.1%
Months of data
36
Fund manager
Sanjay Sinha
Min. investment
₹50 lakh
Inception
30 Aug 2023
Turnover (1y / 1m)
1.03× / 0.05×
Objective (as filed with APMI)To generate wealth and alpha for clients vis-� -vis the benchmark by making investments in Equity Asset Class over a long-term horizon (Atleast 3+ years)
Percentile ranks this fund within its full APMI Strategy (all Equity PMS together — the comparison basis SEBI's Dec-2022 circular prescribes); the benchmark-group percentile is an EdgePnL analytical refinement. The leaderboard Score is the weighted average of fiscal-year percentiles (each blends return-rank and Sharpe-rank).

Equity curve

202320242025202699121143Fund (NAV=100)Inferred BM: BSE 500 TRIDeclared BM: Nifty 50 TRICategory median (Equity)

Drawdown

2023202420252026-17-90Drawdown %

Fiscal-year record

FYReturnDeclared BM
Nifty 50 TRI
Active
vs declared
IR
vs declared
Inferred BM
BSE 500 TRI
Active
vs inferred
IR
vs inferred
vs categorySharpemonths
FY24*17.4%13.7%4.5%0.6119.2%-2.7%-0.422.0%2.138
FY25-1.6%6.6%-8.0%-1.846.0%-7.7%-2.28-6.5%-0.4612
FY260.8%-4.0%5.0%1.22-3.1%4.1%1.395.0%-0.2512
FY27*14.2%9.9%11.9%1.5614.6%-1.1%-0.27-2.5%2.294
Return is the TOTAL return over the months covered — never annualized (FY27* is year-to-date; a * row covers only part of the year). Declared BM = the benchmark the manager selected under the APMI framework. Inferred BM = BSE 500 TRI is estimated by EdgePnL solely from the fund's own return series (a regression on large-, mid- and small-cap index returns decides whether Nifty 50 TRI or BSE 500 TRI fits) — analysis, not an official classification. Active = annualized mean monthly excess return; IR = active / tracking error. Sharpe remains the primary metric.

Monthly returns (%)

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
2023+0.0+0.6-1.8+4.6+5.2+8.7
2024+2.7+4.2+0.8+2.1-0.2+5.1+4.6+0.6+0.1-6.4+0.5-1.4+12.9
2025-3.1-7.8+5.3+4.2+5.3+4.8-3.3-0.4+1.3+3.5+1.7-1.0+10.0
2026-3.2+0.3-11.2+10.1+1.3+1.7+0.7-1.5

Cumulative active return

2023202420252026-9-41Cumulative active return vs inferred benchmark, %
Growth of the fund relative to its benchmark: +10 means ₹100 in the fund is worth 10% more than ₹100 in the benchmark since the start of the line.

AUM & estimated net flows

202320242025202602447AUM, ₹cr
-35202420252026
Monthly net flow estimate: AUM_t − AUM_(t−1)·(1+r_t). Positive = net inflows, ₹cr.
Source: APMI monthly IA-level disclosures (mandated by SEBI's Dec-2022 benchmarking circular); returns are TWRR net of all fees and expenses per SEBI circular of Feb-13-2020, as reported by each portfolio manager. Benchmark series are the cross-reporter modal consensus of manager-reported benchmark figures. Reporting artifacts (impossible values on dormant months) are nulled, never silently dropped; dead funds remain in every month they existed. History begins Apr-2023 (the APMI disclosure floor). Sharpe uses rf 6%, arithmetic monthly convention. Coverage: this site lists the client-facing discretionary PMS universe open to the general public (~₹4.6 lakh crore). SEBI's headline portfolio-manager AUM (₹43.2L cr, Jun-2026) additionally includes ~₹30L+ cr of EPFO/provident-fund special mandates plus non-discretionary (₹3.4L cr) and advisory (₹3.1L cr) assets — none of which publish IA-level returns or are investable products; PF/institutional mandates and private-markets series are excluded from these listings. Independence: all figures are computed from mandatory public disclosures with a fixed methodology applied identically to every fund — no fund can pay for inclusion, exclusion, placement, or altered presentation, and any material commercial relationship will be disclosed on the affected pages. EdgePnL groupings, inferred comparison benchmarks and percentiles are analytical overlays, not official categories; each fund's declared benchmark is always shown. Nothing here is investment advice; past performance does not predict future returns. Generated 2026-08-25 05:37Z · data through Jul 2026 · leaderboard
Feedback, inputs, or bug reports are appreciated — @vivekrmr on X · LinkedIn.